Katydid or Cicadas?

Something that’s bothered me since moving to the south has been the confusion that many southerners make between the Katydid and the Cicadas insects. So, I’ve used this photo opportunity to help clear up this classic case of false identity.

The photo you see above is a closeup shot of the outer shell of a Cicadas ( /sɪˈkeɪdə/ ), not a Katydid as many in the Southeast are prone to believe. Here is a brief outtake from the University of Michigan Zoology Department website:

Cicadas are flying, plant-sucking insects of the Order Hemiptera; their closest relatives are leafhoppers, treehoppers, and fulgoroidea. Adult cicadas tend to be large (most are 25-50mm), with prominent wide-set eyes, short antennae, and clear wings held roof-like over the abdomen. Cicadas are probably best known for their conspicuous acoustic signals or “songs”, which the males make using special structures called tymbals, found on the abdomen. There may be as many as 3000 different cicada species worldwide. Read More

So what is a Katydid?

The Katydid is a member of the Tettigoniidae insect family. Here’s a brief outtake from encyclopedia.com:

Family of ensifera in which auditory communication is well developed. The ovipositor is sword-shaped. Most species are phytophagous, but some are predatory on other insects. It is the largest family in the suborder, with about 5000 species.

For clarity, below is a photograph of a local Katydid—notice it’s much more like a grasshopper than the Cicadas.

5 thoughts on “Katydid or Cicadas?

  1. Yes, the Tarantula Hawk is a very cool wasp. I wish we had them around here… 1) I’d like to photograph one. 2) I’d like to be stung bu one to see how bad the sting really is.


  2. After reading this I thought it was extremely informative. I appreciate you taking the time to research this topic, I’ve always been curious about such things. Your photography is amazing and adds quite a bit to the research. I must say, I found it somewhat out of place for your site. If it had not of been for Google Search, I would not have thought to look here for this type of information.


  3. This article is too funny. I’ve thought the same thing for years, and I’m glad to find an answer. I bookmarked it, odd right? I Have to say the shots are great too. Creepy bugs, but interesting.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s